{"id":"W2081762576","doi":"10.5558/tfc84410-3","title":"Would harmonizing public land forest policies, Criteria and Indicators, and certification improve progress towards Sustainable Forest Management?: A case study in Alberta, Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Certified wood; Sustainable forest management; Harmonization; Certification; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Business; Sustainable management; Context (archaeology); Land management; Environmental planning; Land use; Sustainability; Forestry; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00292297,0.0004284393,0.0003134419,0.001355982,0.02130633,0.003022665,0.00234724,0.002609067,0.002110807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003419232,0.0002498502,0.0003083845,0.004267286,0.00374751,0.0007827384,0.00176456,0.001829095,0.0001301656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1167568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1157422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968579,0.0008648977,0.00006491193,0.0001300656,0.0008381285,0.001244116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972461,0.0007664796,0.0001424184,0.00008077407,0.001048378,0.0007157938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00125527,0.004359058,0.2664139,0.001196765,0.0002179776,0.05948694,0.1796757,0.03527396,0.008194118,0.1732799,0.07242744,0.198219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004035509,0.0007025829,0.2224546,0.0005085223,0.0001883323,0.002580642,0.550787,0.01627993,0.003306939,0.006134924,0.1963972,0.0002558457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9307674,0.001074914,0.001300506,0.006799839,0.00006091977,0.0005081654,0.0004068655,0.00003295851,0.05904838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797981,0.001002226,0.002749574,0.0009987459,0.00001421624,0.0001057393,0.0002286321,0.00001186771,0.01509088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1167568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8471341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02185073404678465,"score_gpt":0.2489062178325987,"score_spread":0.2270554837858141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}