{"id":"W2081838724","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.02.030","title":"Competing risks analysis: A new approach to model lead failures","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heart Rhythm","topic":"Recycling and Waste Management Techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lead (geology); Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Hazard; Common cause failure; Population; Hazard analysis; Reliability engineering; Common cause and special cause; Intensive care medicine; Engineering; Operations management; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003216027,0.0001288061,0.0001939807,0.00009903831,0.0001145111,0.00006200615,0.0001422677,0.00004612674,0.0002102098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001568416,0.0001194195,0.0001118499,0.0005091446,0.00003241853,0.0001302475,0.0001934128,0.0001126931,0.001106298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006820519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000395548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009191214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001508229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988283,0.00003600743,0.0001942014,0.0003846439,0.0002687711,0.0002880698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999451,0.00001534864,0.00003683573,0.0003583296,0.000003040192,0.0001354639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006683657,0.00007220826,0.005528249,0.000004787325,0.00004582691,0.000001241044,0.0006018838,0.9043348,0.0002835419,0.0002264201,0.05873504,0.03015928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001249628,0.00002183054,0.005499313,0.00001102064,0.00009833019,0.00001333824,0.0001427005,0.8640864,0.0006688598,0.0002486499,0.1287975,0.0002871665],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2705645,0.00005607259,0.5430382,0.005529248,0.00003113091,0.0005175401,0.000002541421,0.0005901335,0.1796706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7522518,0.000005942706,0.2410734,0.00101153,0.0000843138,0.00001741167,0.000003725042,0.00001098027,0.005540841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4816874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04670937553750291,"score_gpt":0.2985041049711417,"score_spread":0.2517947294336387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}