{"id":"W2081838724","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.02.030","title":"Competing risks analysis: A new approach to model lead failures","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heart Rhythm","topic":"Recycling and Waste Management Techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lead (geology); Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Hazard; Common cause failure; Population; Hazard analysis; Reliability engineering; Common cause and special cause; Intensive care medicine; Engineering; Operations management; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00997099,0.0037908,0.003681102,0.002919968,0.001064025,0.003454202,0.005690182,0.003593748,0.009838524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03078912,0.001205533,0.003366177,0.003020056,0.001734841,0.003203931,0.002431933,0.004911521,0.0009296236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00165652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003333051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0145651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01061767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938059,0.00428659,0.0002120533,0.0005445911,0.0008607446,0.0002901753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721916,0.02491079,0.0007999626,0.0006471879,0.001010158,0.0004402487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001020808,0.0001047977,0.00128137,0.0001072153,0.0003755998,0.0001943012,0.0001191959,0.8336147,0.0001702237,0.1441583,0.003190754,0.01658145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000440763,0.00003928749,0.0001106995,0.00001043133,0.00009600889,0.00006209189,0.00002509529,0.9355119,0.00003400493,0.06301698,0.001029168,0.00002025275],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002398068,0.0002187226,0.9950528,0.0005003725,0.0001342995,0.00005316602,0.0002218752,0.000115626,0.001305203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3981526,0.00288606,0.5695089,0.0007539102,0.001718309,0.001845556,0.001151723,0.0004628332,0.02352012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0145651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05273229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04670937553750291,"score_gpt":0.2985041049711417,"score_spread":0.2517947294336387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}