{"id":"W2081842608","doi":"10.4296/cwrj3603884","title":"Two-Way Calibration-Validation of SWAT Model for a Small Prairie Watershed with Short Observed Record","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Environmental science; SWAT model; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Calibration; Hydrology (agriculture); Streamflow; Precipitation; Surface runoff; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography; Drainage basin; Meteorology; Geology; Computer science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003210091,0.0007038473,0.0004077614,0.00035647,0.0005707548,0.0005560282,0.0008095877,0.0007034024,0.0003717896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003644541,0.0003955906,0.0008096837,0.0004759981,0.0004929855,0.0005705468,0.0004311378,0.0005445023,0.0000866086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001057552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001361331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03414913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03896957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993376,0.0002173054,0.00006074464,0.0001812053,0.0001406255,0.00006253109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998279,0.0008359223,0.0001796616,0.0002086845,0.0004527382,0.00004409166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000303077,0.0003560619,0.04008098,0.0000366509,0.000125757,0.0001041289,0.0001244853,0.9361638,0.01034704,0.0002994112,0.0002520767,0.01180653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005200517,0.0001246162,0.01761273,0.00000446173,0.00002551796,0.00001480158,0.00002967246,0.974756,0.007085452,0.00008825513,0.0001865418,0.00001989927],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906404,0.00001671503,0.008662238,0.00001633463,0.0000061039,0.00005060573,0.0001576353,0.0001336842,0.0003163148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877434,0.00001552015,0.01151769,0.00001080265,0.000001566641,0.00007251572,0.0003916106,0.00001901641,0.0002279534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06790066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04933525632800923,"score_gpt":0.2047957490909127,"score_spread":0.1554604927629035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}