{"id":"W2081872308","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.045","title":"A half-product based approximation scheme for agreeably weighted completion time variance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scheme (mathematics); Polynomial-time approximation scheme; Variance (accounting); Computer science; Product (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Time complexity; Algorithm; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006124424,0.001168392,0.002212313,0.001294723,0.0007840269,0.002104215,0.004625268,0.001881417,0.006021027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01596858,0.000922671,0.001244075,0.002287997,0.001310953,0.003906151,0.003097791,0.003399417,0.001132451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001961693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002643939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004920546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003877068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972832,0.001003501,0.0001611669,0.0003399173,0.000934394,0.0002776642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921462,0.003960755,0.0003439801,0.001779842,0.001349996,0.000419264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005279434,0.0002353389,0.0006983909,0.0001695398,0.00008241107,0.00007273542,0.0001993767,0.7146383,0.004454846,0.09818983,0.004737478,0.1759937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008092562,0.00002238308,0.00003044081,0.000003840421,0.000005732228,0.000008511804,0.000004254094,0.9913784,0.0003790319,0.007818954,0.0003355754,0.000004731915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004602488,0.0001138049,0.9943774,0.00006086105,0.0000463832,0.00003089165,0.00004057624,0.0001922365,0.0005353612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2269785,0.0003044148,0.767309,0.0001823148,0.0001422529,0.0003266112,0.0003208648,0.0003094187,0.004126682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006124424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0323894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05691974236027591,"score_gpt":0.3040801732575195,"score_spread":0.2471604308972435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}