{"id":"W2081893121","doi":"10.1016/j.jbbm.2003.10.001","title":"Size-exclusion chromatography—a review of calibration methodologies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods","topic":"Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Size-exclusion chromatography; Chromatography; Viscometer; Polymer; Mass spectrometry; Gel permeation chromatography; Detector; Chemistry; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Materials science; Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009260686,0.0002117327,0.0007552688,0.0000420076,0.00004513729,0.00001345477,0.0002004803,0.00020517,0.0003762352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00242204,0.0001447579,0.000546165,0.0004079812,0.0003708785,0.00009259036,0.00004866099,0.0003481985,3.429094e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001153484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004232397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000114967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.846787e-9,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982349,0.0002366416,0.0008101283,0.0002107542,0.0003115264,0.0001960697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975991,0.001253935,0.0005526961,0.0002008357,0.0001859914,0.00020739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004821505,0.0001502488,0.0001029124,0.003782858,0.0001001152,0.000005253685,0.00001073958,1.005852e-7,0.9912696,0.0007238931,0.0005485769,0.003257429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003011289,0.00008493479,0.00005036751,0.00190808,0.0002229113,0.00009451706,0.00005556741,0.00002268022,0.988136,0.00742912,0.001527008,0.0001676633],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.902383,0.05321086,0.03600219,0.001117178,0.0001663648,0.0001146169,0.00002442379,0.0000576203,0.006923706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5587291,0.01584885,0.4246657,0.000397336,0.0002658956,0.00000364053,0.000005153177,0.0000228589,0.00006145264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3886635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5903057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02870900948004814,"score_gpt":0.3468149747749997,"score_spread":0.3181059652949516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}