{"id":"W2081943844","doi":"10.1016/j.cag.2005.03.007","title":"3D visualization techniques to support slicing-based program comprehension","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Graphics","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Computer science; Program slicing; Visualization; Program comprehension; Software visualization; Slicing; Source code; Rendering (computer graphics); Software; Comprehension; Human–computer interaction; Software system; Programming language; Data mining; Component-based software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Computer graphics (images)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004063332,0.0002316107,0.0002143962,0.0007096862,0.0001457708,0.0002818775,0.0011514,0.0001158171,0.00000495509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008770498,0.0002425674,0.00009057149,0.00175399,0.00005480443,0.0003228119,0.0003839399,0.0002338773,0.00005184263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000918056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009297282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000155502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008377149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979366,0.00006935687,0.0003008877,0.000561227,0.0006329133,0.0004990164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982644,0.000322982,0.00005918991,0.0008186424,0.0002734198,0.0002613652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151722,0.0005105636,0.009477814,0.00008150048,0.00002955629,0.00003003742,0.000577396,0.01860444,0.0007098608,0.01145185,0.02473188,0.93378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003007433,0.0008643108,0.009670802,0.0001057915,0.000005134494,0.00001133809,0.000001538788,0.8582816,0.005584453,0.00006942537,0.1246767,0.0004282079],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0292861,0.00002723725,0.9654302,0.0009687725,0.0003169128,0.0006899615,0.000001364027,0.003244127,0.0000353447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4471285,0.000004969146,0.5508678,0.001721598,0.0001401921,0.00007530423,0.00001956897,0.000030254,0.00001184857],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9333517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0232504246986767,"score_gpt":0.3203594905580445,"score_spread":0.2971090658593677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}