{"id":"W2081971933","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1304_2","title":"Animal Ethical Evaluation: An Observational Study of Canadian IACUCs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Observational study; Protocol (science); Psychology; Animal testing; Observational methods in psychology; Animal welfare; Psychological intervention; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Observer (physics); Relation (database); Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002967939,0.0001450666,0.0001718537,0.0001950563,0.0002926282,0.000033763,0.0002063086,0.0003294075,0.0007285781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001620618,0.0001480033,0.00004335275,0.0003552362,0.0001080975,0.0001231868,0.00002423602,0.001452121,0.00002781606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009053274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009476208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04228106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05104706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972346,0.001016784,0.0003364792,0.0003234265,0.0008541563,0.0002345453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983271,0.0003803452,0.0001127567,0.0002879168,0.0006939553,0.0001979497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001929971,0.002852728,0.8775086,0.00002465711,0.00006075172,0.0003312434,0.0357039,0.0000439607,0.0182039,0.06279708,0.0003355251,0.00194458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006480369,0.003919584,0.9889315,0.00002444345,0.0001292848,0.00004562553,0.004124332,0.0002450071,0.0001910475,0.0004612484,0.001051193,0.0002286731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960784,0.0000257549,0.000006024816,0.0005515027,0.0001611018,0.0004299228,0.00002990601,0.00004276308,0.002674567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975575,0.000001532173,0.00178983,0.0003109184,0.00008721414,0.00009104203,0.0000268998,0.00002381853,0.0001112399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1114229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9662688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.822465978733046,"score_gpt":0.5727639251869654,"score_spread":0.2497020535460807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}