{"id":"W2081971933","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1304_2","title":"Animal Ethical Evaluation: An Observational Study of Canadian IACUCs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Observational study; Protocol (science); Psychology; Animal testing; Observational methods in psychology; Animal welfare; Psychological intervention; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Observer (physics); Relation (database); Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008367212,0.0005659919,0.0006691967,0.005079538,0.01029048,0.002100709,0.002036254,0.0009302003,0.002373081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02979382,0.000661968,0.0003708908,0.004847298,0.003666284,0.0007335109,0.002744794,0.001836838,0.0003018306],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03906642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04867999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9323297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9742088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991653,0.001814779,0.0003936083,0.0006992797,0.003825183,0.00161407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765472,0.003476249,0.005259543,0.0009503446,0.01054942,0.003217232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003363911,0.0008989239,0.8125018,0.0003807231,0.00006251258,0.001944335,0.1420592,0.0001560991,0.001894677,0.001121298,0.007466249,0.03117774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001707968,0.0004363595,0.8607767,0.0001942309,0.00002263791,0.0006083105,0.1183072,0.0003794452,0.0003470063,0.0001678244,0.01863917,0.0001039638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945534,0.0003076039,0.0002601068,0.0004758946,0.00001834969,0.000336997,0.0003622608,0.00001349274,0.003671781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952152,0.0009264568,0.001000047,0.0003224764,0.00001420243,0.000251578,0.0003474677,0.00001864529,0.001903922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.283448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.822465978733046,"score_gpt":0.5727639251869654,"score_spread":0.2497020535460807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}