{"id":"W2082269537","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.008","title":"Evaluation of the potential source contribution function using the 2002 Quebec forest fire episode","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Environment","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Atomic Energy Agency; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"HYSPLIT; Environmental science; Aerodynamic diameter; Atmospheric sciences; Particulates; Meteorology; Particle (ecology); Aerosol; Geography; Chemistry; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001028392,0.0005952677,0.000432529,0.00103759,0.001059966,0.001120484,0.0009833988,0.0008280448,0.001883815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003800091,0.0002978832,0.00045939,0.001527423,0.0002202522,0.0005100027,0.0002780339,0.0004427219,0.0002439519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007661378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003804543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9466426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.949521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998035,0.00005680042,0.000008999027,0.00004094206,0.00004556218,0.00004414935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983777,0.000689165,0.00008087799,0.00007543813,0.0006460937,0.0001306279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001148143,0.0003459381,0.2909013,0.0001360717,0.0003145139,0.0006237137,0.0002461139,0.639067,0.003911729,0.001672133,0.00720572,0.05442766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001034487,0.00003466744,0.1881501,0.00001648654,0.00005432602,0.00003931907,0.0001353619,0.8087195,0.0009747977,0.0001399113,0.001602253,0.00002981884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900823,0.0002618493,0.002013921,0.0002412407,0.00001797116,0.00004810907,0.003916637,0.0002252328,0.003192867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930253,0.0000928023,0.002578374,0.00002660776,0.000009928957,0.0000181947,0.003073813,0.00004739756,0.001127604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05335742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1073433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009991185849242282,"score_gpt":0.1913338882228197,"score_spread":0.1813427023735774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}