{"id":"W2082269537","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.008","title":"Evaluation of the potential source contribution function using the 2002 Quebec forest fire episode","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Environment","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Atomic Energy Agency; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"HYSPLIT; Environmental science; Aerodynamic diameter; Atmospheric sciences; Particulates; Meteorology; Particle (ecology); Aerosol; Geography; Chemistry; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006132215,0.0001311122,0.0001091817,2.457111e-7,0.0003188543,0.00002267635,0.0001897668,0.0000721573,0.005433413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003312472,0.00007839887,0.00009580165,0.00009915527,0.0001720059,0.0001335605,0.00002444071,0.0001166528,0.00006969082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006237904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000477568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00462393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002106193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984586,0.0001703802,0.000238408,0.0001962747,0.0007245168,0.0002118719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993774,0.00004316704,0.0002048642,0.0003032681,0.00002740934,0.00004388889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000162721,0.00002502322,0.06137608,0.000002399523,0.00003071014,1.471367e-7,0.00004485644,0.8724744,0.0005753651,0.000003636422,0.0001703654,0.06528069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003263436,0.00002529869,0.3657019,0.000009552688,0.0002380196,0.00000610165,0.00013192,0.6250703,0.0004128664,0.0000789295,0.007900794,0.00009808292],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775069,0.001676112,0.01964319,0.0003693902,0.0001688091,0.0003324625,0.000007481789,0.00001207902,0.0002835229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979014,0.00003836395,0.0007408079,0.0001325805,0.0002226355,0.000004137337,0.00001863552,0.000004180891,0.0009372855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3043258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009991185849242282,"score_gpt":0.1913338882228197,"score_spread":0.1813427023735774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}