{"id":"W2082270370","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.366.464","title":"CAE Analysis and Improvement Design of Double-Decker Coach in Full Front Impact","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced materials research","topic":"Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Deformation (meteorology); Structural engineering; Engineering; Crash; Collision; Simulation; Mechanical engineering; Computer science; Materials science; Composite material; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009101927,0.0001331737,0.0004058671,0.0006754886,0.00003301849,0.00002136198,0.0001303119,0.00006786476,0.001087743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001567792,0.0001153496,0.00006205729,0.0007372997,0.00006205852,0.0002459972,0.00001967177,0.000102076,0.00001274427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007653669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002590575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001202066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005002575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986481,0.00008046974,0.0004272249,0.0001861884,0.0002808984,0.0003771024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994322,0.00005192716,0.0000421381,0.0002593296,0.0001116309,0.0001027437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006625841,0.00004680791,0.002179417,0.00007825309,0.000428181,0.00000642319,0.001173335,0.02713846,0.9665084,0.00005636243,0.00000840392,0.001713405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001192425,0.000252284,0.1000664,0.00002200483,0.0001168567,5.196788e-7,0.000353901,0.001598818,0.8958905,0.0003231184,0.00001076913,0.0001723605],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972239,0.0001958199,0.02691912,0.000005981899,0.00003335238,0.0002905228,0.00005871712,0.0000322118,0.0002253068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958156,0.0006068408,0.003432651,0.000002178472,0.000009455589,0.00005428613,0.00003226949,0.00002032675,0.00002636095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09788696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07374923003348166,"score_gpt":0.3448380364771995,"score_spread":0.2710888064437178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}