{"id":"W2082278804","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.04.006","title":"Applying the Item Response Theory to Classroom Examinations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Rasch model; Medicine; Item response theory; Chiropractic; Metric (unit); Missing data; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Statistics; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04804973,0.001337097,0.001516495,0.004514288,0.0006062268,0.002774372,0.00233114,0.001540888,0.003736078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2655359,0.0006728662,0.001910246,0.0031149,0.002185792,0.002532824,0.002399605,0.00251647,0.001161568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002310158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002219443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009627829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8989447,0.08689764,0.002881323,0.003274082,0.007320942,0.0006813541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7239043,0.2429832,0.00954259,0.01134634,0.01133507,0.0008885629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008803947,0.002291648,0.2084284,0.002331265,0.001711173,0.000613436,0.005148679,0.06848292,0.002667938,0.02170441,0.004303758,0.6814359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009987507,0.01077506,0.2321534,0.002568865,0.000892017,0.001736203,0.005751987,0.6111285,0.009766251,0.09852481,0.02532359,0.00038057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3234058,0.001143497,0.6561865,0.00165536,0.000377351,0.003434479,0.0004388597,0.001297248,0.01206096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.789975,0.0006462629,0.2042775,0.0004880924,0.000156508,0.002900103,0.0004490086,0.0001358207,0.0009716425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04804973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2541143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8091615709690857,"score_gpt":0.5055948934918802,"score_spread":0.3035666774772054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}