{"id":"W2082284957","doi":"10.3141/2407-05","title":"Simplified Uniform Hazard Liquefaction Analysis for Bridges","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BGC Engineering (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Liquefaction; Probabilistic logic; Engineering; Hazard; Penetration test; Standard penetration test; Bridge (graph theory); Probabilistic analysis of algorithms; Hazard analysis; Reliability engineering; Civil engineering; Computer science; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00129797,0.0007627928,0.0005279746,0.001742383,0.0004029836,0.0008264848,0.001035583,0.000534284,0.004496631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004084179,0.0004049554,0.0008909646,0.000800688,0.000447949,0.00118823,0.001037023,0.0005169073,0.0006856946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007845695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001143273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007241102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00888665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988309,0.0002837919,0.00004809336,0.00009932624,0.0006550839,0.0000827766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989029,0.0003433181,0.0001088345,0.0001818708,0.0004419097,0.00002114583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001221083,0.00006925655,0.002701738,0.0001224131,0.00004183563,0.0001725894,0.0001041617,0.8197546,0.03330018,0.01997385,0.002159151,0.121478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001037997,0.0001271127,0.001826739,0.00001146981,0.0000152861,0.000080625,0.00003193806,0.9839045,0.00675277,0.005491772,0.001729001,0.00001848719],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04489724,0.0001064561,0.9485793,0.00003498691,0.00001159908,0.0001046301,0.0002261077,0.0005023149,0.005537344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7092654,0.0003788435,0.279019,0.0000649747,0.00002493367,0.0003536724,0.001150156,0.0002096293,0.009533455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007241102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01504272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04567242024306018,"score_gpt":0.3298326814907374,"score_spread":0.2841602612476772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}