{"id":"W2082313233","doi":"10.1139/l10-087","title":"Numerical solution for two-dimensional flow under sluice gates using the natural element method","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Shiraz University","keywords":"Inviscid flow; Mechanics; Sluice; Flow (mathematics); Potential flow; Fluid dynamics; Free surface; Finite element method; Boundary value problem; Boundary element method; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Structural engineering; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000484503,0.0003114105,0.0004614563,0.0004667093,0.0004437623,0.0004567752,0.0006671791,0.0009381987,0.00153823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001144872,0.0002473854,0.0003437382,0.0002923546,0.0007393609,0.0005824987,0.0006007055,0.0004675954,0.0002491608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003940941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001107355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004009611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003973621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998366,0.0000422853,0.000009474094,0.00001828095,0.00007355041,0.00001989875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996653,0.0001947918,0.00003220623,0.00002460956,0.00006508332,0.00001814282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005768922,0.00006420409,0.001370332,0.0001035101,0.00001147256,0.0001247795,0.0002302041,0.9374251,0.01451892,0.02146611,0.0005290197,0.02409861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006221123,0.000009363126,0.00007992992,0.000002698891,8.300061e-7,0.0000163705,0.00001175141,0.9978244,0.0007865909,0.0007216844,0.0005371205,0.000003121948],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06917952,0.00007854614,0.9249158,0.0001317931,0.00003609091,0.00008333276,0.00007224742,0.0002250781,0.00527756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5784775,0.0002116445,0.4134823,0.00004819808,0.00002074678,0.0003280656,0.0001482052,0.00008013123,0.007203244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004009611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007972538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01011018781303991,"score_gpt":0.2477754663061529,"score_spread":0.237665278493113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}