{"id":"W2082313233","doi":"10.1139/l10-087","title":"Numerical solution for two-dimensional flow under sluice gates using the natural element method","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Shiraz University","keywords":"Inviscid flow; Mechanics; Sluice; Flow (mathematics); Potential flow; Fluid dynamics; Free surface; Finite element method; Boundary value problem; Boundary element method; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Structural engineering; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002359933,0.0001190885,0.0001288651,0.0002071896,0.0001477171,0.00006016579,0.0001245049,0.00004577947,0.00009976437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007080315,0.0001005529,0.0001138478,0.0001415297,0.00001320889,0.0001985315,0.000004630727,0.0004448251,0.000001251661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001983327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001656902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003761319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992854,0.000008975673,0.0002717934,0.00006539976,0.0000992758,0.0002691796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993558,0.0001642033,0.00004150255,0.0001043355,0.00013327,0.0002009195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001647157,0.000002076687,0.00001406886,0.000007736017,0.00005349661,0.00000251625,0.00004916824,0.9696383,0.02842535,0.001112972,0.0003993316,0.0002933012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002024034,0.0000127714,0.0001932496,0.00002835253,0.00003132012,0.0002027871,0.00001207607,0.9953864,0.0004340042,0.0001299644,0.003250498,0.0001161473],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02800657,0.0003139347,0.9675351,0.0003504328,0.003557987,0.0001031243,0.00001470294,0.00002341252,0.00009471568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413149,8.065638e-7,0.0582086,0.00004191498,0.0003806018,0.000003310977,0.000004700179,0.00003038103,0.0000148188],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01011018781303991,"score_gpt":0.2477754663061529,"score_spread":0.237665278493113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}