{"id":"W2082364597","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-3658.2006.00129.x","title":"Measuring the effectiveness of Parks Canada's environmental management system: a case study of Riding Mountain National Park","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Stantec (Canada)","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Mandate; Standardization; National park; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Principal (computer security); Business; Environmental protection; Geography; Environmental science; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003811804,0.0003336933,0.0003480811,0.001417536,0.007176691,0.002316514,0.0017591,0.001033265,0.0009824501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007555807,0.0002714254,0.0002957913,0.002991483,0.002506188,0.0009477576,0.00157189,0.0009656381,0.00009744964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0280956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02186263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9066364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.967789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948145,0.002208462,0.0001511942,0.0003036046,0.001530486,0.0009916633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921049,0.002810355,0.0007298182,0.0003428711,0.00289745,0.001114654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006912334,0.003003537,0.5312347,0.0008774149,0.0002621188,0.01963513,0.2685693,0.01222206,0.005231765,0.01008558,0.007622346,0.1405648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000739868,0.001081257,0.4458442,0.0002165321,0.0001004549,0.001595002,0.5084491,0.006334571,0.004794132,0.0004302333,0.03096538,0.0001151739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950978,0.0001386575,0.0002037608,0.0002555691,0.000003116064,0.00009813916,0.00007839176,0.000006782233,0.004117656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956477,0.0002627388,0.001620831,0.0000873495,0.000003003007,0.00004764821,0.0001057827,0.000005997295,0.002218943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09336358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2038488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005658153874691723,"score_gpt":0.1638945189316231,"score_spread":0.1582363650569314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}