{"id":"W2082434835","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2008.12.011","title":"Inexact fuzzy-stochastic constraint-softened programming – A case study for waste management","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waste Management","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Mathematical optimization; Interval (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Fuzzy logic; Stochastic programming; Range (aeronautics); Constraint satisfaction; Fuzzy set; Constraint programming; Tree (set theory); Random variable; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering; Probabilistic logic; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003350021,0.0004311632,0.0003216482,0.0004742388,0.0001976757,0.0002804218,0.0003163934,0.00005109085,0.00001327962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003939994,0.0004358627,0.0001165602,0.00048256,0.00002878353,0.000202599,0.0001497212,0.0001066775,0.0000258431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001248793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000211651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005679503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001185203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979134,0.00002984705,0.0005208416,0.0005153272,0.0003462645,0.0006743732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992034,0.00001966071,0.00008414635,0.0005269855,0.00003801147,0.0001278194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005837551,0.0004040683,0.00001842885,0.0005706996,0.0006996463,0.002022742,0.001063982,0.7205905,0.000006998408,0.00175384,0.001502853,0.2713079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01404354,0.002121405,0.0001275216,0.0004734372,0.002513428,0.0001852596,0.10514,0.8441922,0.0001076381,0.001001746,0.02740973,0.002684109],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1883996,0.0001974134,0.7525566,0.0002234078,0.000820616,0.01361531,0.00001414161,0.001783621,0.04238925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862617,0.00001436148,0.01079899,0.0001482716,0.0001556092,0.0005914192,0.00004977348,0.00007220771,0.001907671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7978621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01257451400504054,"score_gpt":0.222644798912678,"score_spread":0.2100702849076375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}