{"id":"W2082568468","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.11.018","title":"Numerical investigation of four-lid-driven cavity flow bifurcation using the multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Fluids","topic":"Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Chinese Aeronautical Establishment","keywords":"Reynolds number; Lattice Boltzmann methods; Mechanics; Mathematics; Bifurcation; Vortex; Hopf bifurcation; Vorticity; Flow (mathematics); Hele-Shaw flow; Physics; Classical mechanics; Turbulence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004063364,0.0004213072,0.001088805,0.0006400318,0.0009635483,0.000814218,0.001311713,0.00153923,0.002417272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001109442,0.0003914599,0.0006838985,0.0004531129,0.0008775473,0.0007068989,0.0007345313,0.0007223867,0.0001858481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001263562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01282961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004650819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998645,0.00003624177,0.000005727024,0.00002148614,0.00003029587,0.00004183099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995366,0.0002081997,0.00006324218,0.00002796432,0.00008970526,0.00007427457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001555399,0.0001231714,0.002236486,0.0001123294,0.00004443505,0.000305919,0.00009572193,0.9727257,0.008398219,0.01162944,0.0004777572,0.003695153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009022729,0.000008916411,0.0001200831,0.000002376478,0.000002432583,0.000007383348,0.000007528505,0.9993926,0.0002178199,0.0001719514,0.00005570074,0.000004186429],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8640136,0.0007368816,0.1041428,0.000785342,0.0002565934,0.0001278999,0.0002527078,0.0005176122,0.02916669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861982,0.00009296991,0.01153014,0.00003562635,0.00001503083,0.00004758334,0.00005495183,0.00003124004,0.001994287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01282961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02550983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03006477049204268,"score_gpt":0.2647112086115982,"score_spread":0.2346464381195555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}