{"id":"W2082568468","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.11.018","title":"Numerical investigation of four-lid-driven cavity flow bifurcation using the multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Fluids","topic":"Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Chinese Aeronautical Establishment","keywords":"Reynolds number; Lattice Boltzmann methods; Mechanics; Mathematics; Bifurcation; Vortex; Hopf bifurcation; Vorticity; Flow (mathematics); Hele-Shaw flow; Physics; Classical mechanics; Turbulence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005297384,0.0002294036,0.0003288227,0.0001216203,0.0001999908,0.00005070714,0.0002567257,0.0001046811,0.00001411323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001677055,0.0001976996,0.0001038774,0.0004291761,0.0001013616,0.0002870843,0.00008436808,0.0001762139,0.000041052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001176662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002382173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004559299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003003895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984283,0.000274095,0.0004773281,0.0002549516,0.0003259168,0.0002393788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997952,0.001197414,0.0001327679,0.0004156186,0.0002210412,0.00008119994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006387578,0.0000106536,0.004917987,0.00005918893,0.00010063,3.842391e-7,0.001649556,0.9700187,0.01268734,0.0002106084,0.0007359746,0.009602518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004091404,0.00002679334,0.02438071,0.00005007236,0.00007824419,0.000004499153,0.00002404445,0.9706191,0.003107018,0.0002513315,0.0008434805,0.0002055562],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1915191,0.00007290291,0.8071582,0.0002001441,0.0003910321,0.0002466204,0.000005122072,0.0002421869,0.0001646692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7972386,0.000004056362,0.2022962,0.0001427792,0.0002309422,0.00001009876,0.00002159072,0.00003769224,0.00001803185],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6057194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8061954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03006477049204268,"score_gpt":0.2647112086115982,"score_spread":0.2346464381195555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}