{"id":"W2082641162","doi":"10.1029/2009jd012943","title":"Identification of trends and interannual variability of sulfate and black carbon in the Canadian High Arctic: 1981–2007","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Arctic; Environmental science; Geopotential height; Sulfate; Climatology; Geopotential; Atmospheric sciences; The arctic; Sulfate aerosol; Physical geography; Precipitation; Geography; Oceanography; Stratosphere; Geology; Meteorology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005111595,0.0004011157,0.0003593718,0.00303826,0.001565208,0.0009898819,0.0006391582,0.0003571294,0.0007054416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009910072,0.0002510374,0.0003978426,0.004345587,0.0004613907,0.0003346262,0.0005044194,0.0003629854,0.0001964254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01591291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01601508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995419,0.00001334445,0.00002806674,0.00007761999,0.000227539,0.0001114806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975675,0.00007338867,0.0002168551,0.00004642057,0.001867978,0.0002278408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000150731,0.00004275221,0.9759417,0.0001098755,0.000241549,0.0001133469,0.000951499,0.0007440516,0.002849127,0.0001799567,0.002977446,0.01569801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001491054,0.000004141788,0.9974473,0.000007656562,0.00001858478,0.00001964461,0.0002061941,0.0002800485,0.0002199874,0.000005673131,0.001783175,0.000006155518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870663,0.001149191,0.0001737103,0.000271636,0.00002867329,0.00001574623,0.008057018,0.00003189674,0.003205763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989754,0.0009668695,0.0002931847,0.00005824747,0.00001517515,0.00001460954,0.007010258,0.00000944621,0.001878267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01591291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1154568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01526690718382641,"score_gpt":0.2770166984769579,"score_spread":0.2617497912931315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}