{"id":"W2082684845","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.09.007","title":"A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Critical Care","topic":"Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":373,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Charlson comorbidity index; Index (typography); Database; Chart; Population; Comorbidity; Intensive care medicine; Emergency medicine; Internal medicine; Statistics; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03411603,0.002309686,0.01529362,0.01997201,0.001284246,0.005169641,0.00346919,0.002197898,0.002914345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1334752,0.001701385,0.01047604,0.03130195,0.001506675,0.002574054,0.002374099,0.001843455,0.0002179277],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01603041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05843142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1679707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4237195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9670801,0.01125999,0.01095559,0.00197758,0.008082058,0.0006446815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9018443,0.06869552,0.014207,0.001677055,0.01270615,0.0008700446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000283237,0.00001952807,0.002699262,0.8828943,0.02884424,0.00008559883,0.0003152968,0.0002155857,0.00009714188,0.0005257594,0.004249912,0.07977024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005909346,0.0001654197,0.01826377,0.7582146,0.1853347,0.0002970858,0.0003880553,0.0002293007,0.0001711082,0.0006553435,0.03557139,0.0001184291],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005509075,0.9980748,0.0001527498,0.0003551122,0.0001035992,0.0001982872,0.0004175052,0.000004896101,0.0001420719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01267187,0.9841483,0.001783544,0.0006046874,0.00007238267,0.0003539927,0.0002857444,0.000006539925,0.00007299896],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3339859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5325782423761238,"score_gpt":0.6068529247337547,"score_spread":0.0742746823576309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}