{"id":"W2082684845","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.09.007","title":"A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Critical Care","topic":"Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":373,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Charlson comorbidity index; Index (typography); Database; Chart; Population; Comorbidity; Intensive care medicine; Emergency medicine; Internal medicine; Statistics; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461728,0.0004447272,0.003655591,0.0006038739,0.0001612517,0.00003196208,0.0003710391,0.0002480714,0.0001593623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01960752,0.0002522185,0.001141268,0.0006486363,0.0004070666,0.00009005351,0.00008498588,0.002336066,0.000008359316],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008575249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006330059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007139987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009636265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928516,0.002732756,0.001754556,0.0004083708,0.001699398,0.000553322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914259,0.003030309,0.0004755181,0.0007576248,0.003638933,0.0006716537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002965167,0.0006048577,0.0001186941,0.9900073,0.0002266639,0.0009926806,0.001389708,2.65049e-7,2.052374e-8,0.00221413,0.0001701554,0.004245916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005112471,0.001175096,0.00023843,0.9563423,0.01044253,0.0007177271,0.02442353,0.000002507785,0.000002546405,0.00001981039,0.005920013,0.0002042688],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000684429,0.993718,0.000001311383,0.001512749,0.0002547216,0.002721653,0.001026955,0.000002704389,0.0006934181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09918001,0.8997849,0.0001066849,0.0003636817,0.0003735921,0.00012198,0.00002398389,0.00004211803,0.000003047114],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09911156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5325782423761238,"score_gpt":0.6068529247337547,"score_spread":0.0742746823576309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}