{"id":"W2082727335","doi":"10.1142/s0218127405012211","title":"NOVEL NUMERICAL APPROACH TO SOLITARY–WAVE SOLUTIONS IDENTIFICATION OF BOUSSINESQ AND KORTEWEG–DE VRIES EQUATIONS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos","topic":"Image and Signal Denoising Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Korteweg–de Vries equation; Mathematics; Boussinesq approximation (buoyancy); Mathematical analysis; Inverse problem; Boundary (topology); Identification (biology); Applied mathematics; Physics; Nonlinear system; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007298412,0.00007592847,0.0001259692,0.0003015723,0.00008661315,0.0001451357,0.0002894179,0.00003811057,0.00000364129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002493847,0.00006966082,0.00004842391,0.0001753167,0.00005452669,0.0006239797,0.00008182214,0.00009388071,0.000002086994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005919858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009962458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000201783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001829112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988741,0.00005613747,0.0004787366,0.0001333927,0.0003495978,0.0001080053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987621,0.0001082957,0.000301823,0.0001139767,0.0006186119,0.00009515893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001271159,0.001086898,0.0005430251,0.00003470017,0.0002405587,0.000005693783,0.01516068,0.006054094,0.2777074,0.3123613,0.001270906,0.3854077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002591071,0.0002631086,0.08418468,0.0001366677,0.00008524689,0.001561444,0.0008044492,0.8602815,0.0275757,0.01546244,0.006601943,0.0004517459],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01408485,0.0002306369,0.977169,0.00793444,0.0002047364,0.00006208806,0.000006184474,0.0000107156,0.0002973142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8250462,0.00004469571,0.1741665,0.0003991638,0.0001987186,0.000003445076,0.000003139563,0.000004011992,0.0001341191],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8542274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2840686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04783930201379,"score_gpt":0.3102597947149116,"score_spread":0.2624204927011216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}