{"id":"W2082800559","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.006","title":"Assessing the mire conservation status of a raised bog site in Salzburg using object-based monitoring and structural analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape and Urban Planning","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Bog; Mire; Environmental resource management; Vegetation (pathology); Natura 2000; Metric (unit); Geography; Habitat; Conservation status; Computer science; Cartography; Peat; Ecology; Environmental science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003994289,0.0001465441,0.000206784,0.001091231,0.0003289614,0.0004505783,0.0003904471,0.0002676494,0.0005608289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006919737,0.000159731,0.000128575,0.0003629582,0.0003627673,0.0002998644,0.0006659101,0.0001430348,0.000143985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006888647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004316932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04720121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1412412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998374,0.00004096833,0.000008361377,0.00002419795,0.00004285753,0.00004610566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999747,0.00005173349,0.00007973899,0.0000217209,0.00005024459,0.00004953723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004541473,0.0001531329,0.9633606,0.00002958462,0.0000622537,0.000686444,0.001296219,0.001203461,0.01740475,0.0002317656,0.0001385451,0.01497918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000928586,0.0000651029,0.9965435,0.000005070666,0.00001511458,0.0000864692,0.000659243,0.001813646,0.0005966777,0.00003804988,0.0001648047,0.000003153839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996308,0.0000118925,0.00008800743,0.00001167149,8.086752e-7,0.000005366405,0.00005042985,0.000004960799,0.0001960415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943,0.00001425717,0.000280412,0.000004673571,0.000001243774,0.000005683753,0.00007921937,0.000001240495,0.0001832902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04720121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09385294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01481413492064117,"score_gpt":0.260370242725369,"score_spread":0.2455561078047278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}