{"id":"W2082800559","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.006","title":"Assessing the mire conservation status of a raised bog site in Salzburg using object-based monitoring and structural analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape and Urban Planning","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Bog; Mire; Environmental resource management; Vegetation (pathology); Natura 2000; Metric (unit); Geography; Habitat; Conservation status; Computer science; Cartography; Peat; Ecology; Environmental science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001533731,0.00009539445,0.0001757027,0.00007341587,0.000146152,0.0001011595,0.00004510246,0.00004149651,0.00002510053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005345429,0.00006418166,0.00002563569,0.0003476702,0.00001769145,0.0002730509,0.00003416964,0.00006139698,3.510835e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002090822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007812728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002514935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000351931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992537,0.0000444529,0.0001981275,0.0001669178,0.0001283079,0.0002085082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996519,0.0001008682,0.0001170876,0.00008983077,0.000005237807,0.00003507311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000124897,0.000004112333,0.9768703,0.0000217475,0.0000164723,0.000005077165,0.0005412315,0.01958288,0.002885308,6.933358e-7,0.00001422789,0.00004546409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003010361,0.000007978269,0.7771766,0.00004900494,0.00006076074,0.000001507673,0.0003067758,0.2216143,0.000360448,0.00001001856,0.00003977861,0.00007185402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998824,0.0007450706,0.00005479468,0.00002160213,0.00002777395,0.00006639287,0.000005423531,0.00001075371,0.0002442025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996775,0.000005060047,0.0002292338,0.000021315,0.00003564658,0.000001858919,0.00002010851,0.000005249141,0.000004064855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2020314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3801847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01481413492064117,"score_gpt":0.260370242725369,"score_spread":0.2455561078047278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}