{"id":"W2082820511","doi":"10.1155/2010/596839","title":"Estimating the Conditional Tail Expectation in the Case of Heavy‐Tailed Losses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Probability and Statistics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Society of Actuaries","keywords":"Mathematics; Estimator; Nonparametric statistics; Moment (physics); Normality; Applied mathematics; Econometrics; Asymptotic distribution; Measure (data warehouse); Extreme value theory; Conditional expectation; Variable (mathematics); Expected shortfall; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Economics; Risk management; Computer science; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001974497,0.00006217603,0.0002066456,0.000056122,0.000119975,0.00004020936,0.0001076044,0.00004584517,0.00003190122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001888635,0.00004262988,0.00003959008,0.00009629309,0.0001655949,0.0001389923,0.00001414033,0.0003237113,9.715015e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001658987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004647214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002150108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007512791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989736,0.00004381117,0.0007598942,0.00008955822,0.00004419543,0.00008892277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986235,0.0005762858,0.0005272539,0.0001188731,0.0001314558,0.00002256526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006388751,0.0001889452,0.1008399,0.0001158564,0.00001484952,0.00005081076,0.005972548,0.0024783,0.00002557735,0.8852251,0.0001377362,0.004886514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002969845,0.00009981279,0.05398594,0.00001261982,0.000007988942,0.0002139565,0.0004752407,0.1294282,0.00001055333,0.8153328,0.00008024335,0.00005568652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.765165,0.0001463578,0.2338986,0.000330133,0.0001405357,0.00009407577,0.0001589629,9.672252e-7,0.00006541006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8916327,0.00001250034,0.1082409,0.00003201919,0.00007036648,0.000002800289,0.000003277386,0.000002824411,0.000002582625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1269499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2261009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03872077139254841,"score_gpt":0.2689682912247841,"score_spread":0.2302475198322357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}