{"id":"W2082903421","doi":"10.1139/f08-015","title":"Combining multiple Bayesian data analyses in a sequential framework for quantitative fisheries stock assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stock assessment; Salmo; Stock (firearms); Bayesian probability; Fishery; Computer science; Fisheries management; Bayesian inference; Fish stock; Econometrics; Environmental science; Statistics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography; Fishing; Mathematics; Biology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03837376,0.00220601,0.002476776,0.005351616,0.001028358,0.003279432,0.002651488,0.001582799,0.002705654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0666697,0.001938579,0.003013382,0.003514085,0.002262701,0.00438473,0.003494872,0.002574801,0.000542963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002135686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003880831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008987213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01299094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9800172,0.01276725,0.001248415,0.001721147,0.003911126,0.000334835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9543096,0.03685408,0.002746606,0.002445607,0.003206364,0.0004376604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002171104,0.0001933946,0.008382628,0.0007060526,0.0009660263,0.0003668781,0.0008998764,0.5325438,0.003200231,0.1734631,0.001215675,0.2778453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000606257,0.0001206623,0.001496764,0.0001231726,0.000192769,0.0001392854,0.00007580432,0.7608652,0.0009388035,0.232551,0.003329973,0.0001060584],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001235162,0.00008521524,0.9982723,0.00004738264,0.00000806756,0.00005253575,0.00003971663,0.00006216563,0.0001973885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05857507,0.000264635,0.939764,0.00007281148,0.00006975637,0.0005347476,0.000269369,0.00006687377,0.0003827764],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03837376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2029423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1913889999391893,"score_gpt":0.3792401091239663,"score_spread":0.187851109184777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}