{"id":"W2082903698","doi":"10.1029/2009jd013728","title":"Review of the formulation of present‐generation stratospheric chemistry‐climate models and associated external forcings","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Atmospheric Ozone and Climate","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; National Science Foundation; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; Sight Research UK; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University Corporation for Atmospheric Research; National Center for Atmospheric Research","keywords":"Stratosphere; Radiative forcing; Climate model; Atmospheric chemistry; Ozone layer; Troposphere; Atmospheric sciences; Environmental science; Climatology; Forcing (mathematics); Meteorology; Climate change; Ozone; Physics; Aerosol; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001201251,0.0001116645,0.0003345725,0.00000281346,0.0001398767,0.00003905761,0.0003363011,0.00007845124,0.0006575803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004379042,0.000068411,0.0001571862,0.0003744998,0.0001998144,0.0004344922,0.00004945146,0.0005343274,0.000002305364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007026647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001621547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008750931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000231095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978658,0.0001510179,0.0005807336,0.000131301,0.0009665674,0.0003046115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981292,0.0002881078,0.0005966033,0.0001943843,0.0006584192,0.0001332604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008597231,0.0009200032,0.3262534,0.008266219,0.0004726001,0.00002880999,0.0008404399,0.009778912,0.4131486,0.002009074,0.006250193,0.231172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001637397,0.001297211,0.5937592,0.005353263,0.0001839849,0.00006079597,0.0003757861,0.3387139,0.03732308,0.02004759,0.0008533076,0.0003945453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931692,0.005045553,0.0001048041,0.000202094,0.00008164547,0.0001652594,0.00001633018,0.000003106534,0.001211963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930497,0.005536206,0.001083365,0.00003328239,0.0001905973,7.554049e-7,0.000004437542,0.00000506928,0.00009663344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3758255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7200043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03590867854491807,"score_gpt":0.3010762751419777,"score_spread":0.2651675965970596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}