{"id":"W2082907843","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.05.003","title":"Evaluating local food programs: The case of Select Nova Scotia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Technical University of Nova Scotia; Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Marketing; Local government; Business; Consumption (sociology); Perception; Government (linguistics); Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Engineering; Sociology; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001731416,0.0001175742,0.0001171762,0.000007036667,0.0002152212,0.00006661128,0.00008369513,0.00007586576,0.0001779103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009649301,0.00003560162,0.00004555397,0.0003737875,0.00006997505,0.0001380947,0.00003969017,0.0001329291,0.000007148713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001308428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001121235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001436145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003923702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988725,0.0002254974,0.0002005605,0.0001567213,0.0002734465,0.000271304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994679,0.0001404946,0.0001245152,0.00004025119,0.000147288,0.00007952227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001038194,0.000108698,0.009742148,0.00001082604,0.00002386771,0.000001450733,0.001202725,0.00001541951,0.005701425,0.00009188586,0.0001983533,0.9828928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003183603,0.01992981,0.7698415,0.000931744,0.001224749,0.005027841,0.08897933,0.04911127,0.02362183,0.001054374,0.03499499,0.002098947],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954786,0.002653917,0.000006451616,0.0005725901,0.0001087309,0.0007645125,0.000004779094,0.00006251459,0.000347922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991279,0.000002819372,0.0004178903,0.00005734307,0.0002883963,0.00003021914,0.00006312336,0.000001006653,0.0000113532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1947993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1144218093796592,"score_gpt":0.375084479348663,"score_spread":0.2606626699690038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}