{"id":"W2082936408","doi":"10.1139/f00-150","title":"Use and abuse of fishery models","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fisheries management; Fish stock; Stock (firearms); Fishery; Skepticism; Reputation; Stock assessment; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Fishing; Geography; Epistemology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02999318,0.001619487,0.00134218,0.003756991,0.003002184,0.007260196,0.003866055,0.004292374,0.00346101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08514999,0.00096545,0.001701729,0.003090628,0.01624179,0.01701074,0.007376841,0.006335015,0.001261482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005886396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003192276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01406737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005701994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815594,0.00996107,0.001439632,0.001957097,0.00451328,0.0005696255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475088,0.03169561,0.003827617,0.01173794,0.004481095,0.000748953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002254801,0.0000081512,0.001156681,0.00006370725,0.00002994074,0.0001160174,0.0008565953,0.00536354,0.00006977196,0.9715143,0.003452783,0.01734598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001028474,0.00002090128,0.000396074,0.000227955,0.00002399241,0.0002320364,0.0003077997,0.02869289,0.0002913909,0.9147653,0.05499176,0.00003955967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05126924,0.03372436,0.5706254,0.1404711,0.00251016,0.00009432185,0.000899168,0.001202066,0.1992042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7959576,0.01743942,0.1507417,0.00940073,0.001682975,0.0002757044,0.0005200828,0.0006704612,0.02331136],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.158621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04949866915482874,"score_gpt":0.2327450196290086,"score_spread":0.1832463504741798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}