{"id":"W2083014813","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.03.003","title":"A kin-selection approach to the resolution of sex-ratio conflict between mates","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex ratio; Compromise; Kin selection; Sex allocation; Offspring; Resource allocation; Brood; Investment (military); Inclusive fitness; Parental investment; Parent–offspring conflict; Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Competition (biology); Economics; Demography; Ecology; Computer science; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001660022,0.000301868,0.0007365047,0.0008245347,0.0009462697,0.001576198,0.00207636,0.001365912,0.01057879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004120453,0.0002464969,0.0007082087,0.0005440302,0.002018206,0.001814368,0.00109145,0.001214984,0.0006152177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009411232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006718372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001088427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002066232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994625,0.0003343372,0.00001474812,0.00007203595,0.00006309111,0.00005316595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989043,0.0006526028,0.0001093739,0.00008442195,0.0001174823,0.0001316719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006750633,0.0000802737,0.003702737,0.00006514018,0.000123237,0.0003803242,0.0004592142,0.04631235,0.003012972,0.9087342,0.001854555,0.03520747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004112829,0.00008178004,0.003590679,0.0000147515,0.00004326834,0.0003665854,0.0003168029,0.1771712,0.0002073759,0.8154307,0.002701092,0.00003469035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2507602,0.002118743,0.62975,0.01440074,0.0005993954,0.0001032796,0.0001315687,0.0001079745,0.1020281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534237,0.0005972996,0.03476787,0.0006023443,0.0004702328,0.00005776357,0.0000290566,0.0000360763,0.01001566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01057879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03538954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04121873658538262,"score_gpt":0.3306945382814924,"score_spread":0.2894758016961098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}