{"id":"W2083035480","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2009.02.005","title":"Rationale and design of RE-LY: Randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy, warfarin, compared with dabigatran","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Heart Journal","topic":"Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":334,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Dabigatran; Warfarin; Stroke (engine); Atrial fibrillation; Dosing; Discovery and development of direct thrombin inhibitors; Direct thrombin inhibitor; Randomized controlled trial; Adverse effect; Vitamin K antagonist; Internal medicine; Thrombin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001498038,0.00009490587,0.000677695,0.0001329546,0.00005439365,0.00001496988,0.00003282408,0.00001566682,0.000093874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108739,0.00006200888,0.0001043657,0.0001653134,0.00021773,0.00008368342,0.000004792473,0.00007438624,6.276821e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001903966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001216169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001447745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001263062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998466,0.0003576253,0.0004170302,0.00009820718,0.0005589782,0.0001021684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989262,0.0002334424,0.0003514951,0.0001088409,0.0003093008,0.00007073826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.09852193,0.0001189462,0.7890104,0.00004277939,0.0008500658,0.00001710913,0.001367298,0.003849189,0.04521856,0.0001436164,0.0004148897,0.06044519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08685039,0.001227615,0.9005811,0.0001310914,0.0005720546,0.0001938577,0.0002191997,0.006258829,0.003624663,0.0001947139,0.00003563386,0.0001108902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864323,0.0005267904,0.009081919,0.002801183,0.00003135316,0.001016272,7.726388e-7,0.000008690926,0.0001007089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993877,0.0004295124,0.005315911,0.0002010609,0.0001328947,0.000001409216,0.000006112306,0.000006792144,0.00002933794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1115706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2528649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1652085127618145,"score_gpt":0.3933646001243076,"score_spread":0.2281560873624931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}