{"id":"W2083063306","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.002","title":"Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Policy","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Accountability; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Qualitative research; Appeal; Focus group; Health care; Nursing; Psychology; Public relations; Process management; Medicine; Medical education; Business; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0340379,0.0002409811,0.0008534597,0.0004349666,0.0006097655,0.0001087651,0.0001278543,0.00009093758,0.00002183134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002675461,0.0002744182,0.00003289581,0.000400281,0.00009198317,0.0008553689,0.00003216897,0.0002243747,0.0001052952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001468104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002228308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05329654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005658302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943314,0.001291055,0.00279834,0.0007724906,0.0002004949,0.0006062704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996188,0.0003800954,0.002299182,0.0004564201,0.0001920385,0.0004842139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000350693,0.001061959,0.03083204,0.001122994,0.00009173404,0.00002861458,0.9237751,0.0004648772,9.216903e-8,0.03966231,0.0002471653,0.002677986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01054007,0.007128959,0.0568615,0.000337782,0.00002933583,0.0005627062,0.8282465,0.005016424,0.000001155963,0.08920854,0.000923689,0.001143376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9226107,0.00069686,0.000636327,0.07186726,0.00008992054,0.003580086,0.0001391858,0.00007645637,0.0003032136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871365,0.00002355431,0.002892784,0.008988561,0.0004446176,0.000430839,0.00002422671,0.00003994372,0.00001899539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09552871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3768580276900952,"score_gpt":0.5784208225352487,"score_spread":0.2015627948451535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}