{"id":"W2083063306","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.002","title":"Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Policy","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Accountability; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Qualitative research; Appeal; Focus group; Health care; Nursing; Psychology; Public relations; Process management; Medicine; Medical education; Business; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07074019,0.0006787578,0.001009908,0.003331827,0.01893086,0.007497047,0.004444321,0.005666748,0.00665755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11118,0.001171075,0.0007908055,0.003854413,0.009009578,0.006163945,0.008460963,0.005352031,0.0005404755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02871007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02910249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0216011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03161594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8814289,0.106708,0.001685147,0.001362751,0.003620797,0.005194402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7801636,0.1904144,0.006667602,0.002928818,0.009919655,0.0099059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001118929,0.008075429,0.0213815,0.001372498,0.00006499033,0.005311982,0.8789403,0.001627362,0.001376916,0.02433874,0.004268758,0.05212261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003991003,0.001626357,0.00579276,0.0006699493,0.00006196641,0.0008261235,0.9713959,0.00245483,0.00127442,0.005526818,0.009864874,0.0001069012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668787,0.0003375706,0.007917866,0.007210884,0.00009246436,0.003814341,0.0002174821,0.0000436792,0.01348714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880617,0.0002333237,0.007261007,0.0009509278,0.00002390924,0.001649393,0.00005015338,0.0000219315,0.001747725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07074019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3741143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3768580276900952,"score_gpt":0.5784208225352487,"score_spread":0.2015627948451535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}