{"id":"W2083118038","doi":"10.1007/s10163-012-0090-9","title":"Evaluation of environmental pollution and possible management options of heavy oil fly ash","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","topic":"Coal and Its By-products","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Fly ash; Environmental science; Waste management; Leaching (pedology); Pollutant; Pollution; Environmental engineering; Heavy metals; Soil water; Environmental chemistry; Engineering; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006271247,0.0002642794,0.0002654552,0.0005994093,0.0004130316,0.000733849,0.0002985789,0.0004207529,0.001099503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005041048,0.00009787683,0.0004443632,0.0004618101,0.0002182824,0.0003830569,0.0002064685,0.0001543799,0.0001071108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007255504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005254453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007230327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01060295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999649,0.00009852588,0.00001740449,0.00003072525,0.0001653188,0.00003906726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996586,0.0001020795,0.00004030489,0.00001513591,0.000153275,0.00003065825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01975763,0.002847656,0.227027,0.0007166552,0.0003543112,0.0009421688,0.0002874669,0.0430795,0.6081273,0.001374742,0.0003442165,0.09514135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001428753,0.01124764,0.1717556,0.0000344208,0.0005472282,0.0002113992,0.001057002,0.04302923,0.7686729,0.0008435825,0.00241493,0.00004317048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986597,0.0001236309,0.000263184,0.00001117549,0.000001830589,0.00001316352,0.00005859405,0.000003143061,0.0008656483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987848,0.0001154497,0.0003253372,0.00000377522,0.000001039975,0.00000332175,0.00005538066,0.000001495135,0.000709259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007230327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01437652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01744274853852743,"score_gpt":0.2149786694666448,"score_spread":0.1975359209281174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}