{"id":"W2083221911","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.02.002","title":"Inclusive and personal fitness in synergistic evolutionary games on graphs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inclusive fitness; Graph; Population; Mathematics; Extension (predicate logic); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Biology; Evolutionary biology; Demography; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007637278,0.00007036285,0.0001622151,0.0001330376,0.0001709454,0.00001584497,0.0001307618,0.0001228273,0.001106641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009387563,0.00005191677,0.00004874696,0.0001330624,0.001721512,0.0001316789,0.00003488536,0.0002205356,0.00002354667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007719612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001065743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004422563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001626425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986408,0.00071129,0.0002383015,0.00009946074,0.0001296294,0.000180482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988763,0.0007331143,0.00009248761,0.00004152201,0.0001578713,0.00009873901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001070923,0.00006531579,0.00320384,0.000002102236,0.000009768068,0.000006160733,0.001243917,0.000009848246,0.0006170265,0.9921662,0.0002072898,0.002361466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002818673,0.0004073948,0.01352177,0.00003344117,0.000008547597,0.00001991874,0.001705741,0.0002359981,0.00002854384,0.9830567,0.0006228152,0.00007724481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816872,0.0004236148,0.0002087241,0.009163592,0.0002349484,0.0000901801,0.000002894391,0.000005876866,0.008182961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990389,0.0001808958,0.0001236715,0.0003784523,0.0001929351,0.000004367039,0.000001515355,0.000003051,0.00007616062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01735174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006942552133583769,"score_gpt":0.2852430929314532,"score_spread":0.2783005407978695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}