{"id":"W2083248209","doi":"10.1007/s13349-012-0016-1","title":"Critical review on the assessment of glulam structures using shear core samples","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"GLUE; Shear (geology); Structural engineering; Bending; Beam (structure); Core (optical fiber); Direct shear test; Shear strength (soil); Flexural strength; Engineering; Scale (ratio); Materials science; Geology; Composite material; Mechanical engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004906329,0.0001819647,0.000444308,0.00006748827,0.0001618488,0.00002350921,0.0001619983,0.0000444245,0.00006375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009381637,0.0001017271,0.0001270407,0.000112912,0.00004782411,0.0002644615,0.0000216769,0.0003828113,4.577846e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002435586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007066144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002348322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001936919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983851,0.00009441692,0.0006496546,0.00006185516,0.0004454123,0.0003635399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990743,0.0002641437,0.0002244336,0.0001556909,0.0001152156,0.0001661492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000182093,0.0001430611,0.7873204,0.02780023,0.001345846,0.00003466194,0.004788727,0.02258532,0.01273136,0.02055176,0.004516085,0.1180005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007685436,0.001010431,0.961726,0.01566126,0.0003231127,0.0005129494,0.0007759847,0.00198644,0.01136742,0.002865173,0.002411715,0.0005910164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273067,0.06893235,0.00009288309,0.0005746565,0.002749915,0.0001741132,0.000007587003,0.00002141495,0.0001404022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909805,0.003961488,0.003774568,0.00006143036,0.001195067,0.000001621103,6.328696e-7,0.00002288548,0.000001809074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1744056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4148309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1527178161453681,"score_gpt":0.3970164066255308,"score_spread":0.2442985904801626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}