{"id":"W2083258227","doi":"10.1139/x05-181","title":"An ecogeographic framework for in situ conservation of forest trees in British Columbia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Forest Genetics Council of British Columbia","keywords":"Geography; Ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Environmental resource management; Forest inventory; Forest management; Forestry; Biology; Computer science; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007523972,0.0004487367,0.0003298331,0.005352717,0.002330462,0.004691421,0.001412743,0.0005029927,0.004003819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002088517,0.0002741918,0.000245571,0.007513919,0.002355359,0.001206848,0.00125695,0.0005955552,0.0001599642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01350501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009028608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9293526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995436,0.0001439894,0.0000332123,0.00009439744,0.00009808248,0.00008661257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993392,0.0001070912,0.0000815828,0.00004954651,0.0003300246,0.00009257795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000384498,0.00006674609,0.1146795,0.0003065992,0.000116833,0.001620644,0.007675025,0.06332292,0.001956069,0.625553,0.01537493,0.1692893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003952301,0.00004345458,0.3521679,0.0009269918,0.0001284141,0.001058841,0.03081257,0.1238037,0.0004789128,0.238286,0.2520997,0.0001539503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3353965,0.006880921,0.3641877,0.01071356,0.0001602145,0.0007055436,0.00704731,0.0007511103,0.2741572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8654145,0.00154561,0.1207359,0.0001934311,0.000020892,0.0003280202,0.00150927,0.00006951259,0.01018279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2199879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02698587263740512,"score_gpt":0.2976552805754591,"score_spread":0.2706694079380541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}