{"id":"W2083264198","doi":"10.1002/bdrb.20276","title":"A different approach to validating screening assays for developmental toxicity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Birth Defects Research Part B Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Child and Family Research Institute; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Developmental toxicity; Toxicity; Computational biology; Set (abstract data type); Biology; Toxicology; Linkage (software); In vivo; Bioinformatics; Computer science; Genetics; Medicine; Gene; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002831899,0.0003587297,0.00037885,0.0003349043,0.0009106293,0.0001085448,0.0004679672,0.0003133136,0.00004357028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002186494,0.0003091339,0.00009516814,0.0004028904,0.0004824786,0.00001903806,0.001445421,0.0006579931,0.00003188702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001011947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003641651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001619449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001303788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954806,0.0004206813,0.0004082668,0.001793399,0.0006040553,0.001292975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984252,0.0001849923,0.00007495126,0.0003881792,0.0004130699,0.0005135707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004611883,0.0003899025,0.01258322,0.0001090363,0.0001282007,0.000005957741,0.0002801558,0.000008220208,0.9721918,0.0002289405,0.004792626,0.008820735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001020166,0.0007637962,0.02438689,0.00002305349,0.00000665223,0.0002293357,0.0006898674,0.00004868919,0.8626841,0.0001398942,0.1095155,0.0004920362],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892671,0.0001188956,0.002629726,0.0004329673,0.0002561927,0.002354327,0.00005141182,0.00003656218,0.004852787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509271,0.00005962718,0.04233798,0.0001976592,0.000619858,0.001242377,0.0001866611,0.00006330084,0.004365414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1095077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07154054600212789,"score_gpt":0.3361236820995079,"score_spread":0.26458313609738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}