{"id":"W2083273963","doi":"10.1139/x04-213","title":"Estimating forest canopy bulk density using six indirect methods","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Crown (dentistry); Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Leaf area index; Remote sensing; Tree canopy; Forestry; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Geography; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007692609,0.0001716968,0.0003312915,0.0005161171,0.0006290216,0.0001893173,0.0007319101,0.0001331263,0.0007223323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002101076,0.0001572594,0.0001120571,0.0008016201,0.0004063277,0.0005069046,0.0001017209,0.0009069047,0.0002115683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002684619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001048486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1271519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7479357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965448,0.0007947004,0.0005043724,0.0002579522,0.0008196785,0.001078534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973,0.0005728669,0.0002205036,0.0003391477,0.0001452138,0.001422298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001700924,0.00001940881,0.9049479,0.00002567007,0.00003046253,0.0004127744,0.0006114742,0.04989979,0.002981365,0.00004060986,0.002937364,0.03807614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007731199,0.0004495723,0.6791315,0.0003581004,0.0000339982,0.001833907,0.0001419837,0.2822642,0.005295094,0.0009194671,0.02830688,0.0004921111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935918,0.0001828454,0.002545759,0.0004238652,0.0004222733,0.0002716605,0.000004853566,0.000007599554,0.002549308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9135216,0.000001703488,0.08571477,0.00005599296,0.0004670393,0.000003353293,0.000001023753,0.00003292956,0.0002015097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6207838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8786605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.059980364141217,"score_gpt":0.3689485407360035,"score_spread":0.3089681765947865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}