{"id":"W2083273963","doi":"10.1139/x04-213","title":"Estimating forest canopy bulk density using six indirect methods","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Crown (dentistry); Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Leaf area index; Remote sensing; Tree canopy; Forestry; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Geography; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000700999,0.0007627138,0.0005759298,0.002775754,0.0003507344,0.0006651192,0.0006078196,0.0002828689,0.001567317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002085067,0.000371213,0.0004803313,0.001159534,0.0001753885,0.0004341398,0.0007432197,0.0003682403,0.0004430803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005000093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003638626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005077329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01774812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993767,0.00008608577,0.00003594747,0.000126189,0.0003341287,0.00004092329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989892,0.0003306479,0.0001654551,0.0001029871,0.0003496167,0.00006214065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004398688,0.0002439373,0.611028,0.0003857295,0.0003382966,0.00009518846,0.0003505425,0.0123233,0.03008045,0.0007997503,0.0008456421,0.3430693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104409,0.0006688046,0.8319001,0.000110015,0.0003638895,0.0008476498,0.0002662687,0.123785,0.03691541,0.0009419062,0.00394026,0.0001564259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.853785,0.0008811512,0.1341571,0.00002669818,0.00002872098,0.0004521094,0.002209578,0.0006329503,0.007826825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8224521,0.0005842225,0.1704636,0.00002547264,0.00002903883,0.0006188305,0.002676791,0.00006092541,0.003089083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005077329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01009554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.059980364141217,"score_gpt":0.3689485407360035,"score_spread":0.3089681765947865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}