{"id":"W2083426277","doi":"10.1160/th12-10-0715","title":"Do open label blinded outcome studies of novel anticoagulants versus warfarin have equivalent validity to those carried out under double-blind conditions?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Thrombosis and Haemostasis","topic":"Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Warfarin; Medicine; Outcome (game theory); Surgery; Anesthesia; Internal medicine; Atrial fibrillation; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":3,"stratum":"aff_core","weight":5595.2375,"opus":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Meta-epidemiological comparison of PROBE versus double-blind trial designs and whether design affects estimated effects; the object is study design and its validity."},"gpt":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"The object is whether different clinical trial designs have equivalent validity, which directly studies research methods."},"grok":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Primary object is clinical-trial design validity (PROBE vs double-blind), i.e. research methods properties."}}}