{"id":"W2083487179","doi":"10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[61:ebsatd]2.0.co;2","title":"Evaluating bridge survey ability to detect river otter Lontra canadensis presence: a comparative study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Biology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Fonds en Fiducie pour la Faune du Nouveau-Brunswick; Université de Moncton","keywords":"Otter; Habitat; Geography; Bridge (graph theory); National park; Survey methodology; Ecology; Environmental science; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Biology; Archaeology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00122052,0.000191848,0.0003234153,0.00004085308,0.0003737449,0.000007336945,0.0003123789,0.0001332608,0.0006640013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006531429,0.0001731139,0.00004415294,0.0003230217,0.0005417285,0.0001110463,0.0002302125,0.0001916992,0.0006744382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002000821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006916761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0287253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0611098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969994,0.001397846,0.0003440358,0.0006377779,0.0001917875,0.0004291955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986891,0.0006141626,0.0001055117,0.0003882032,0.00004467638,0.0001583329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001069129,0.0001064853,0.9825244,8.721871e-7,0.00002386067,0.000008668889,0.002692748,0.0003875979,0.000360892,0.000002227272,0.01324161,0.0005437232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004447592,0.0006723975,0.9972649,0.000001807679,0.00001311586,0.00001317672,0.00006253254,0.0003855262,0.00002457641,0.00006637739,0.0008510643,0.0001998027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997541,0.000009165429,0.0001899211,0.000777478,0.000254497,0.0008888387,0.00002526236,0.00004154765,0.000272364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952426,0.000001644102,0.0006443891,0.003711804,0.0000584055,0.0001065496,0.0000192844,0.000007963064,0.0002073586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0323845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1130701420750845,"score_gpt":0.3492267023193373,"score_spread":0.2361565602442529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}