{"id":"W2083504428","doi":"10.1080/02331880701600380","title":"Bayesian analysis of a 2×2 contingency table with dependent proportions and exact sample size","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics","topic":"Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Contingency table; Dirichlet distribution; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Marginal likelihood; Sample size determination; Bayesian average; Econometrics; Posterior probability; Bayesian inference; Bayesian statistics; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01784915,0.0004278861,0.001291809,0.00155424,0.0005124462,0.001530182,0.001444415,0.0008042246,0.004804207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08791529,0.0006080371,0.000822897,0.001593031,0.00164756,0.002241453,0.001116697,0.001682573,0.0003266104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001065548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001031181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00438931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005027112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888755,0.00747241,0.0003420805,0.001537433,0.001434909,0.0003376905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.880427,0.1115442,0.002672744,0.002599067,0.002301983,0.0004549642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006975539,0.0001354242,0.02113246,0.0004311257,0.0004924501,0.0008907231,0.0006528196,0.4066389,0.003577515,0.4077822,0.003782392,0.1537864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004284697,0.00006718659,0.004829324,0.00006180835,0.0000536494,0.0002409539,0.00009303449,0.7914448,0.001225712,0.2003102,0.00158391,0.00004647337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03409779,0.0001919408,0.9644032,0.000182497,0.00002746138,0.0000446136,0.0001328862,0.0001363902,0.0007833571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5530241,0.0002776606,0.4438176,0.0002128199,0.00008893233,0.0002110307,0.0004147082,0.0001251622,0.001828109],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01784915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09439641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04052479091243303,"score_gpt":0.3355575696822632,"score_spread":0.2950327787698302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}