{"id":"W2083584242","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.101","title":"Dynamic independent component analysis approach for fault detection and diagnosis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fault detection and isolation; Component (thermodynamics); Fault (geology); Data mining; Process (computing); Independent component analysis; Component analysis; Root cause; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Reliability engineering; Machine learning; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000415965,0.001243517,0.001192927,0.001255302,0.0005235373,0.0009174515,0.001061479,0.0006882456,0.002238248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001452521,0.0003530762,0.0007906341,0.001110949,0.0004071353,0.00082256,0.0005535249,0.001274118,0.001056985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000521305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008290791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005863418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004455022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999499,0.00009956495,0.0000293114,0.0001171279,0.0002129283,0.00004210341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995422,0.0001682066,0.00002816505,0.00006397563,0.0001864326,0.00001095472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002112081,0.0000991879,0.0006178321,0.0003161918,0.0003277097,0.0001646673,0.0001005852,0.26851,0.01618852,0.05205149,0.005129825,0.6562828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001170738,0.00005715021,0.0004138122,0.00001216022,0.00006986555,0.00008286293,0.00001529984,0.9717196,0.00386208,0.01872315,0.005014042,0.000018309],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001066308,0.0004736944,0.9971442,0.00004111595,0.00004863535,0.00001588354,0.00002305903,0.0002640955,0.000923056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3345509,0.002526755,0.6528236,0.000150504,0.0002577412,0.0002829931,0.00042744,0.0002149371,0.008765268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005863418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01165861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005600101482105121,"score_gpt":0.2219482992190848,"score_spread":0.2163481977369797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}