{"id":"W2083584242","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.101","title":"Dynamic independent component analysis approach for fault detection and diagnosis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fault detection and isolation; Component (thermodynamics); Fault (geology); Data mining; Process (computing); Independent component analysis; Component analysis; Root cause; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Reliability engineering; Machine learning; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001286182,0.0001686087,0.0002676941,0.0002090615,0.0001941754,0.00009799915,0.0001052599,0.0001223382,0.000003811978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003912943,0.0001442235,0.00007412868,0.0004031068,0.00002943916,0.00007181113,0.000008811334,0.0001444438,0.000006154999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005851045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006130476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002521208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005597621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990904,0.00001754291,0.0002638297,0.000289639,0.0001556681,0.0001829236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993424,0.00005558221,0.00006187316,0.0003561759,0.00006617003,0.00011783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001476035,0.0006445188,0.00642902,0.001126742,0.005940404,0.000001956891,0.002973646,0.4631016,0.4535505,0.003624762,0.0008203374,0.06163894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004664844,0.00002562146,0.001058543,0.000005003694,0.0001174261,0.000022961,0.0005728707,0.9556104,0.0006476464,0.000004086696,0.04125208,0.0002168712],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05477808,0.0006935619,0.9413143,0.00002804197,0.0002157779,0.001998886,0.00003511924,0.0004177498,0.0005184732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742371,0.00003044655,0.001793629,0.00001014624,0.0001085878,0.02365742,0.00004004297,0.00003371887,0.00008886153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5881265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005600101482105121,"score_gpt":0.2219482992190848,"score_spread":0.2163481977369797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}