{"id":"W2083587042","doi":"10.1145/1882291.1882351","title":"Using dynamic analysis to create trace-focused user interfaces for IDEs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Human–computer interaction; User interface; Focus (optics); Visualization; User interface design; Software visualization; Interface (matter); Software; Graphical user interface; Task (project management); Software development; Software engineering; User experience design; Software construction; Systems engineering; Engineering; Operating system; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002904644,0.00123602,0.0005344544,0.002041315,0.0005738036,0.002981834,0.001601285,0.001022794,0.00624533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01205629,0.0007836545,0.0009728656,0.0006177212,0.0008721639,0.004278235,0.00347693,0.001571908,0.001580239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003752704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005975686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000540985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008303314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982892,0.0006049315,0.0001137467,0.0002791293,0.0005767318,0.0001362968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936691,0.004040792,0.0002653916,0.001138221,0.0007045956,0.0001820472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007091048,0.0003291174,0.003493065,0.0006696034,0.0001254731,0.001093291,0.009165027,0.02086271,0.1086518,0.07568305,0.01281314,0.7664046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004003257,0.0005842778,0.002361661,0.0005549578,0.0002235196,0.001984148,0.001919515,0.4303701,0.208279,0.0964993,0.2564855,0.0003379258],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00650048,0.00006085636,0.9855419,0.00007588879,0.00002178663,0.00005222973,0.00006966086,0.00586948,0.001807702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1007972,0.0001679535,0.8932236,0.0000956534,0.00001728168,0.000189235,0.0003507756,0.002653159,0.002505084],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00624533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02089274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03178156484843799,"score_gpt":0.3348683368160225,"score_spread":0.3030867719675845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}