{"id":"W2083757274","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904210101","title":"The Canadian Senate in Bicameral Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Rhetoric; Superlative; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Corporate governance; Sociology; Philosophy; Management; Theology; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002457358,0.00007732311,0.0001317451,0.0002454655,0.001827513,0.0004007188,0.0008258512,0.00006654482,0.00002727637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004695121,0.00005527088,0.00006180225,0.0008783027,0.004087706,0.0003674665,0.00001052164,0.0003385293,0.00002970032],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01115684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0454612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967445,0.00009014903,0.0002756347,0.0001414959,0.0005985521,0.002149664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939905,0.00008467948,0.0000721709,0.0001175464,0.0004698457,0.005265231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[7.843954e-7,0.000002872305,0.002187411,4.342419e-7,0.000001432783,0.0001042854,0.001642183,0.000006274377,0.00001171873,0.9958827,0.00006409836,0.00009574135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003986797,0.00007498206,0.4998488,0.0001229526,0.000005979522,0.00009003349,0.00985589,0.000008477131,0.0001614237,0.3727965,0.1163921,0.0002441822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7145789,0.0003619584,0.00001588,0.1370486,0.001186396,0.000153878,0.00002179119,0.000004727858,0.1466279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981138,0.000004883324,0.0000400987,0.001248638,0.0003419924,0.000001003595,2.23505e-8,0.000003846425,0.0002456882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6230862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01588373545609952,"score_gpt":0.3025322991179286,"score_spread":0.2866485636618291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}