{"id":"W2083868985","doi":"10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.131","title":"\"A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment\": Correction to Hilton et al. (2004).","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Assessment","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Poison control; Risk assessment; Occupational safety and health; Suicide prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Wife; Actuarial science; Forensic engineering; Medical emergency; Clinical psychology; Engineering; Computer security; Medicine; Law; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003294118,0.00133355,0.001043548,0.002295971,0.001356745,0.001183596,0.002339395,0.001566531,0.01086246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04832354,0.0005450558,0.0009780755,0.001471777,0.0009145178,0.0005729606,0.001374325,0.003236634,0.005073038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004551199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009526439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4038852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5878448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972271,0.0004923225,0.0003222666,0.000105097,0.001724745,0.000128406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852524,0.002887639,0.001198684,0.0005317042,0.009671269,0.0004581545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005865378,0.00002119572,0.005259574,0.0001363568,0.00002474059,0.0001748193,0.0001857113,0.0002086985,0.0001617774,0.000656724,0.9466121,0.04649966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596121,0.0001252379,0.1426327,0.0007783142,0.0001636442,0.001658826,0.0004682845,0.004413106,0.0007736073,0.002070487,0.8465479,0.0002083577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.027181,0.02733046,0.04184961,0.3507769,0.3926564,0.00227868,0.09707586,0.01063148,0.05021953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2725694,0.0313152,0.09788251,0.1017994,0.0571206,0.003751935,0.04649862,0.001938001,0.3871243],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5961148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8030687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04789260608557293,"score_gpt":0.4230079904898626,"score_spread":0.3751153844042897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}