{"id":"W2083868985","doi":"10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.131","title":"\"A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment\": Correction to Hilton et al. (2004).","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Assessment","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Poison control; Risk assessment; Occupational safety and health; Suicide prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Wife; Actuarial science; Forensic engineering; Medical emergency; Clinical psychology; Engineering; Computer security; Medicine; Law; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007342355,0.0003717826,0.000459235,0.0000943515,0.001509871,0.0003380591,0.0009132816,0.0002876874,0.0006965009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005331809,0.0002254183,0.0003170287,0.0005049573,0.000391764,0.0003844771,0.0001344949,0.001375555,0.00002751389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001334027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006340823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01360621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01273984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945424,0.001221289,0.0008566824,0.0008313078,0.001766051,0.0007823347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956599,0.00223633,0.0005461185,0.0007084931,0.000615721,0.000233445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007070823,0.00480099,0.1100669,0.000021672,0.0005915397,0.000007287034,0.008386948,0.01091117,0.001609461,0.05147353,0.6543462,0.1570772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001064598,0.0009743908,0.6539508,0.00004732412,0.0001542982,0.000003668546,0.001391458,0.003647485,0.00002886805,0.001219762,0.3372689,0.0002484673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09605993,0.0001064711,0.5532494,0.04537084,0.01659143,0.007331183,0.0003102722,0.0004531548,0.2805273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725585,0.0003073561,0.01664474,0.007242064,0.0006601354,0.0009732099,0.0000567267,0.00002717207,0.001530121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8764985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04789260608557293,"score_gpt":0.4230079904898626,"score_spread":0.3751153844042897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}