{"id":"W2083901661","doi":"10.1163/094330509x12568874557252","title":"You Show Your Smith and I’ll Show Mine: Selection, Exegesis, and the Politics of Citation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Constructive; Citation; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Exegesis; Poetics; Object (grammar); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Art; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008699067,0.00008244195,0.0002285087,0.0001173656,0.000349762,0.00004444871,0.0002212153,0.0000297319,0.000002497215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000647053,0.00004775053,0.00004380344,0.0004099462,0.0002427465,0.00009505206,0.00003159575,0.0001036516,1.28931e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000106411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002248952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001867801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006258712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958655,0.003286045,0.0002536409,0.0001586357,0.0002936655,0.0001425033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981772,0.001401548,0.0001684653,0.0001661824,0.00006270194,0.00002386596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002632493,0.0004737735,0.02518447,0.00002763493,0.0001139142,0.000001301143,0.3486223,0.00008530534,0.0006377543,0.5467147,0.0006338909,0.07724167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001766035,0.0006189188,0.090441,0.00007677831,0.0004558845,0.000004447797,0.2634819,0.0005601904,0.0003119819,0.6407208,0.001361106,0.0002010357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894515,0.0009117704,0.003869672,0.001828733,0.00002981758,0.0003995301,0.000004279119,0.000008925673,0.003495814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970725,0.0007417934,0.001813816,0.0001240967,0.00005670996,0.000007882513,0.000001186527,0.000003557222,0.0001785118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09400607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.301494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0222123477526411,"score_gpt":0.3484354068318179,"score_spread":0.3262230590791768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}