{"id":"W2083969292","doi":"10.13031/2013.18194","title":"Environmental Alternatives for Rural Development: The Case of Oaxaca, Mexico","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","topic":"Regional Development and Innovation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Occupational safety and health; Suicide prevention; Injury prevention; Environmental planning; Forensic engineering; Geography; Engineering; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009771402,0.00006058266,0.0001389529,0.00002862884,0.0006138475,0.00001721132,0.00008789102,0.00002986749,0.00001476238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001613274,0.00003038816,0.00004513098,0.00008070051,0.00009421414,0.0003091863,0.00001322919,0.00008511177,8.549649e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001653301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001370426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008477744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003795547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991396,0.00005533483,0.0004383154,0.00004564003,0.0001822285,0.0001388788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992732,0.00007090632,0.0004965839,0.00001889524,0.00007095324,0.00006950727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003246592,0.0002194901,0.009682965,0.00006155772,0.0002041992,0.000008739414,0.1048969,0.00009708676,0.001010132,0.09023064,0.01064432,0.7826192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005022708,0.0001063654,0.8136513,0.00004781902,0.00000595222,0.0001739613,0.01880738,0.00000386785,0.0002105047,0.0002399793,0.1661784,0.00007227549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452964,0.0007066089,0.0002247704,0.05268867,0.0001330669,0.0002237632,0.000004954774,0.000002965731,0.0007187906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942511,0.002915829,0.001799232,0.0003924681,0.0002815049,0.000001316527,0.000004869024,0.000001761095,0.0003519043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8039683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.472128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02937251034382692,"score_gpt":0.3130978270055337,"score_spread":0.2837253166617068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}