{"id":"W2084049068","doi":"10.5589/m10-004","title":"Implications of land-use history for forest regeneration in the Brazilian Amazon","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Geography; Clearance; Forest regeneration; Land use; Secondary forest; Forestry; Biomass (ecology); Regeneration (biology); Old-growth forest; Agroforestry; Forest inventory; Deforestation (computer science); Land use, land-use change and forestry; Agriculture; Ecology; Forest management; Environmental science; Archaeology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005695637,0.0001543563,0.0002300329,0.0008425259,0.0005684014,0.0006976461,0.0002721209,0.0001548701,0.001380723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003329549,0.0001468324,0.0002254639,0.001082386,0.0005188821,0.0004936085,0.0004625471,0.0002158276,0.0000749811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001105277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006130303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09178633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2826745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997125,0.00007489485,0.00002092773,0.00005103782,0.00004574206,0.00009472852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982109,0.0005427749,0.0006428399,0.0001007403,0.0002277569,0.0002749716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005496863,0.00001864415,0.9875447,0.00002973551,0.00003144394,0.0001143082,0.0006645119,0.0003301744,0.0009671436,0.0003065054,0.00007993772,0.009858033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001375056,0.00001095492,0.9984745,0.00000925367,0.000009141337,0.00006909531,0.0005088333,0.0004383398,0.00006075502,0.00009040703,0.0003243583,0.000002945522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981036,0.0003403297,0.0001107034,0.0001188817,0.000002152004,0.000004162379,0.0001840451,0.000004092633,0.001132041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996915,0.0001018627,0.0000499832,0.000005633013,0.000001686148,0.00000143998,0.00005884038,0.000001482574,0.0000876388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09178633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1825041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02512700069084018,"score_gpt":0.2050954922651191,"score_spread":0.1799684915742789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}