{"id":"W2084049068","doi":"10.5589/m10-004","title":"Implications of land-use history for forest regeneration in the Brazilian Amazon","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Geography; Clearance; Forest regeneration; Land use; Secondary forest; Forestry; Biomass (ecology); Regeneration (biology); Old-growth forest; Agroforestry; Forest inventory; Deforestation (computer science); Land use, land-use change and forestry; Agriculture; Ecology; Forest management; Environmental science; Archaeology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002651869,0.00004210067,0.00006385531,0.00009148422,0.0001020188,0.00001691202,0.0001054608,0.00002428827,0.00001325932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005531231,0.00003412585,0.00004371419,0.0000977029,0.0000545068,0.00008173446,0.000004267986,0.00005333519,0.000001178645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003703533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006980086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01320653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2396696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995741,0.0000303558,0.0001540594,0.00005866634,0.00007891853,0.000103916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996429,0.00002809512,0.0001231667,0.0001061483,0.00002694138,0.00007274911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002430943,0.00001478015,0.3124733,0.00000819429,0.00001174327,0.00002842771,0.004845886,0.003629101,0.002106905,0.00007412169,0.02098121,0.655802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001811213,0.00004705745,0.8793333,0.00002082907,0.00001548157,0.00002187502,0.0001640616,0.002392699,0.00003775312,0.0004632634,0.1172763,0.00004621609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835023,0.00007300707,0.00715708,0.007555237,0.00008383196,0.0001379951,0.000002633279,0.000001380606,0.001486577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991611,0.000008580239,0.007135036,0.001060799,0.00004085369,1.01697e-8,0.0000032633,0.000002163258,0.0001383148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6557558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02512700069084018,"score_gpt":0.2050954922651191,"score_spread":0.1799684915742789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}