{"id":"W2084224700","doi":"10.1890/04-0642","title":"RANGE CONTRACTION MAY NOT ALWAYS PREDICT CORE AREAS: AN EXAMPLE FROM MARINE FISH","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Range (aeronautics); Population density; Ecology; Density dependence; Abundance (ecology); Population; Geography; Fishery; Population dynamics of fisheries; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001680048,0.0001074694,0.0001354806,0.00001540457,0.0002339473,0.0000441913,0.0003246397,0.0001201141,0.1076962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002578898,0.00009398313,0.00004276439,0.0001653796,0.0001792193,0.0002272397,0.0002981822,0.0002126726,0.001088433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000142978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007828774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00323447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006302051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988209,0.00003692562,0.0002071238,0.0004231703,0.0002367494,0.0002751334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991686,0.0001742669,0.0000564894,0.0003874136,0.00001352277,0.0001996852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001053982,0.001362425,0.4692338,0.000002670382,0.00001892724,0.000005087742,0.00009921397,0.0001123533,0.001725881,0.00190348,0.0204345,0.5049962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002181415,0.00005519124,0.5100063,1.774183e-7,0.000005382128,0.000001527718,0.00002229623,0.001479145,0.00005665157,0.0006760359,0.4874031,0.00007607523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6434835,0.000001703966,0.002677295,0.00377782,0.00003231623,0.001144585,0.0001042115,0.0002168576,0.3485617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903578,0.0000424564,0.002953832,0.001408313,0.0002921525,0.001105402,0.0004367572,0.00001044335,0.003392854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5049201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05166598764263833,"score_gpt":0.273036163780196,"score_spread":0.2213701761375577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}