{"id":"W2084321376","doi":"10.1614/ipsm-d-11-00085.1","title":"Community-Level Waterbird Responses to Water Hyacinth (<i>Eichhornia crassipes</i>)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Invasive Plant Science and Management","topic":"Biological Control of Invasive Species","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad de Guadalajara; Commission for Environmental Cooperation; Virginia Lakes and Watersheds Association; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Hyacinth; Eichhornia crassipes; Species richness; Ecology; Abiotic component; Invasive species; Canonical correspondence analysis; Biology; Aquatic plant; Macrophyte","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001979343,0.0002173389,0.0002140835,0.00007426344,0.00110738,0.0002091275,0.0007502186,0.0000570127,0.0001324761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002643265,0.00006944011,0.00004600327,0.0003696878,0.0004657986,0.000423509,0.000966778,0.0001786853,0.0003403884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006776049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007893156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002433633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000641193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978626,0.000181024,0.0002279861,0.0003404563,0.0005056384,0.0008822503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989895,0.000288896,0.00004753873,0.0001439068,0.0001405725,0.000389549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001371461,0.0001645273,0.01248301,0.00002337472,0.00002486013,0.00001823125,0.0007066504,8.207784e-7,0.9545317,0.003042091,0.005681971,0.02318559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001761322,0.0004458407,0.7133304,0.00004671947,0.00002139638,0.0000229893,0.00209095,0.000001468872,0.1156183,0.0004497533,0.167421,0.0003749978],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867036,0.00005913467,0.00001089287,0.007161902,0.0002172154,0.000470718,0.0001214514,0.00007586339,0.005179275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917772,0.0001354864,0.0003367872,0.006591746,0.0001350645,0.00005907574,0.00002866197,0.00000118015,0.0009347675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8389134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8517186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06678891298474864,"score_gpt":0.2396125267224717,"score_spread":0.1728236137377231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}