{"id":"W2084373381","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.3.645","title":"Access to Information (ATI) as a Double-Edged Sword for Critical Policing Research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Secrecy; Scholarship; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Politics; Legislation; Critical security studies; National security; Public relations; SWORD; Security studies; Legislature; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Cloud computing security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003440317,0.0001140288,0.0002479894,0.0001815705,0.002045515,0.000508812,0.0004519236,0.0001965194,0.0002430846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009582497,0.0001276189,0.0001887352,0.0003600796,0.0005384838,0.001837389,0.00002854794,0.0005035908,0.000009109487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008495327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002537253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8836422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9641406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982368,0.0001586226,0.000390622,0.0001367491,0.0001676762,0.0009094878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959556,0.0005740817,0.0001457818,0.0001438938,0.0009864456,0.002194216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002011895,0.000006404838,0.0002115875,0.00003441455,0.00002944743,0.000003863003,0.3872063,0.000003079475,0.000007689372,0.6068297,0.004280741,0.001366693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001339048,0.0005178793,0.006175753,0.0003281005,0.0001252711,0.0001058857,0.2326599,0.00005381828,0.00003336047,0.06580342,0.6923565,0.0005010139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7859361,0.00005583761,0.0006180804,0.02659669,0.001022184,0.0006238747,0.0001028435,0.00001585905,0.1850286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885469,0.0001085283,0.001051092,0.00896991,0.0005993932,0.00002210624,0.00000485465,0.00001565248,0.0006815328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6880758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1622817664549004,"score_gpt":0.4413478857781334,"score_spread":0.279066119323233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}