{"id":"W2084409992","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0024778","title":"Personality May Confound Common Measures of Mate-Choice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mate choice; Preference; Personality; Trait; Sexual selection; Affect (linguistics); Zebra finch; Taeniopygia; Attractiveness; Mating; Variation (astronomy); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Mating preferences; Big Five personality traits; Biology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Zoology; Statistics; Computer science; Communication","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006755536,0.0008220189,0.001023669,0.001141188,0.0008766121,0.0008906327,0.0007054332,0.0005669303,0.001611161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01810418,0.0003381401,0.0006727877,0.001351833,0.00106226,0.0004769946,0.001062423,0.0008672379,0.0002988908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003835643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002595742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003046501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007705941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990823,0.005062037,0.0007427508,0.001772237,0.001326422,0.0002734954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831027,0.007844565,0.003667654,0.003622908,0.001174807,0.0005874165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000538599,0.0002432616,0.9429556,0.0004701329,0.001202491,0.0002127221,0.001444521,0.0005879426,0.01741616,0.0008902586,0.0008826619,0.03315568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006437383,0.0002159122,0.9965838,0.00001848587,0.00007398575,0.0001188556,0.0001656111,0.0003730551,0.00121197,0.0005645872,0.0006532568,0.00001384854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740101,0.001166465,0.01873146,0.0001869656,0.0002382448,0.0002049047,0.001288926,0.00008238076,0.004090558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900337,0.0002260351,0.0073254,0.0003165664,0.00005079971,0.0003821336,0.0006520508,0.00005294054,0.000960461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006755536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03572708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2865129103241059,"score_gpt":0.2580227162333613,"score_spread":0.02849019409074455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}