{"id":"W2084451370","doi":"10.1139/x07-119","title":"Comparison of linear and mixed-effect regression models and a <i>k</i>-nearest neighbour approach for estimation of single-tree biomass","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Academy of Finland; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Scots pine; Mathematics; Statistics; Diameter at breast height; Linear regression; Mixed model; Linear model; Context (archaeology); Ordinary least squares; Regression analysis; Regression; Picea abies; Tree (set theory); Pinus <genus>; Forestry; Ecology; Geography; Botany; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001184438,0.00009478249,0.0002792569,0.0002923997,0.0002718485,0.00001326664,0.000203082,0.00009449523,0.0000197278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002542055,0.00007502673,0.00004736105,0.0002313102,0.0009283687,0.0002182702,0.00006919856,0.0001862797,0.000001055523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001093277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001142397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003144036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01884556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998749,0.0001347237,0.0003388005,0.0001517916,0.0003134708,0.0003122224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990427,0.0002199361,0.0001925395,0.0001371078,0.00007344871,0.0003342721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003196448,0.0001818129,0.9297545,0.000339538,0.00005436222,0.00004623011,0.001300118,0.04788484,0.001699856,0.001783967,0.006213681,0.01042143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002178333,0.00457397,0.7121423,0.0002099476,0.00005117392,0.000169926,0.0003666756,0.2631727,0.00941244,0.006787761,0.0007156497,0.0002190937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898185,0.0003706898,0.008112656,0.0001354824,0.00004110279,0.000370389,0.000009300617,0.000001630714,0.001140258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935892,0.00002511677,0.006258667,0.000005486875,0.00001844808,0.000008514528,0.000005844567,0.000009714864,0.00007898781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2176122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07263348425044977,"score_gpt":0.3277046699685705,"score_spread":0.2550711857181207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}