{"id":"W2084451370","doi":"10.1139/x07-119","title":"Comparison of linear and mixed-effect regression models and a <i>k</i>-nearest neighbour approach for estimation of single-tree biomass","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Academy of Finland; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Scots pine; Mathematics; Statistics; Diameter at breast height; Linear regression; Mixed model; Linear model; Context (archaeology); Ordinary least squares; Regression analysis; Regression; Picea abies; Tree (set theory); Pinus <genus>; Forestry; Ecology; Geography; Botany; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01627322,0.001161375,0.001300944,0.001295393,0.0003884618,0.001303012,0.003286024,0.001303779,0.001281827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02429995,0.0005546847,0.002736509,0.001124004,0.0004811585,0.002077473,0.0009457885,0.001284873,0.0006433743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009610335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009344136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01262511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01400984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915594,0.00644972,0.0002760335,0.001028843,0.0005198935,0.0001661047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722021,0.02356076,0.0009317482,0.001334026,0.001741576,0.0002297405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001634554,0.0003715731,0.02842181,0.0006025,0.00158201,0.0001539048,0.0004323742,0.8493758,0.001828347,0.005863843,0.001005333,0.108728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002212987,0.0001793211,0.005420001,0.0000216542,0.00007133206,0.0000349397,0.00008119618,0.991671,0.0004196752,0.001760046,0.0002788888,0.00003976123],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3287091,0.001381288,0.6655883,0.0003342566,0.0001230785,0.0001584348,0.0007361325,0.0009736763,0.001995707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7707744,0.0004263276,0.2252587,0.0001004306,0.00003954856,0.0002824321,0.001355498,0.0002642608,0.001498339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01627322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08606207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07263348425044977,"score_gpt":0.3277046699685705,"score_spread":0.2550711857181207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}