{"id":"W2084481113","doi":"10.1109/dasc.2011.42","title":"A Natural Classification Scheme for Software Security Patterns","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Software security assurance; Computer science; Security testing; Security information and event management; Computer security model; Security bug; Scheme (mathematics); Security through obscurity; Classification scheme; Security service; Secure coding; Security engineering; Software; Computer security; Cloud computing security; Information security; Machine learning; Mathematics; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001833542,0.00008022253,0.00006977285,0.00007556448,0.00005060314,0.00005619352,0.0006943181,0.00004466901,0.00003422546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004220767,0.00007108472,0.00004724315,0.0001660401,0.00001334222,0.0003232782,0.0001416771,0.0001151066,0.00004527466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003840301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003446111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002911129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007691689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991761,0.0000117954,0.0001037216,0.0002769071,0.000181346,0.0002501504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990784,0.0002396313,0.00002121856,0.0004635248,0.000127501,0.00006975169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005114499,0.0004815189,0.630558,0.0004480104,0.0001204988,0.00002338128,0.007925107,0.000004577939,0.005549015,0.2434838,0.01656303,0.09479195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007129367,0.0001624644,0.8019333,0.00003256945,0.000003912814,0.00001748801,0.00006176635,0.1717975,0.01444433,0.007298598,0.003015365,0.0005196661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09502345,0.00002787438,0.903617,0.0001139783,0.000285805,0.000199495,0.000002696918,0.0006287824,0.0001008707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7546175,0.000001219901,0.2450487,0.00005339026,0.00003200716,0.00006071636,0.000003417771,0.000007085046,0.00017602],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.659594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2898751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05391884910734808,"score_gpt":0.281155768824041,"score_spread":0.227236919716693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}