{"id":"W2084488603","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00195.x","title":"RACE, SCIENCE AND A NOVEL: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY DIALOGUE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Developing World Bioethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Dalhousie University","funders":"University of British Columbia; Dalhousie University; University of Victoria","keywords":"Destiny (ISS module); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Discipline; Race (biology); Epistemology; Sociobiology; Social science; Gender studies; Anthropology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04990605,0.0001959542,0.0002526203,0.0005533578,0.004782034,0.00005166477,0.0006083373,0.0004352516,0.00004150775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02249241,0.0001738777,0.00001997332,0.002160031,0.004076783,0.0005876994,0.001666443,0.007151728,0.0001116005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000459528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002744289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001914783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01441861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960254,0.0006097744,0.0006934028,0.0006041691,0.001156934,0.0009103508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866448,0.01089902,0.0002936282,0.0004962387,0.001222005,0.0004443159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009564788,0.00006404979,0.01117919,0.000306777,0.00001308424,0.00002850117,0.0233876,4.429509e-7,0.001627112,0.9563001,0.001116272,0.005881225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003275448,0.000336528,0.346418,0.003875671,0.0000986996,0.00008284607,0.08450066,0.0009451886,0.0026327,0.2875109,0.2680203,0.002303115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2444088,0.0003554161,0.2549877,0.3061338,0.01272217,0.002182129,0.0000256584,0.001083995,0.1781003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906251,0.00007300283,0.08483979,0.02282869,0.0006569682,0.00001903655,0.00001115151,0.0000390997,0.0009072167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6687892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2144388706492058,"score_gpt":0.55765069782336,"score_spread":0.3432118271741542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}